| Author |
 Topic  |
|
legalstories
666 Posts |
 Posted - Jan 03 2012 : 19:06:04
|
KEN GRUBB quote:
"What did they tell you when they stopped you?"
ANSWER:
THEY GAVE NO REASON and DENIED the DIRECTOR CONTACT the EMBASSY.
ALL IS RECORDED and WILL BE PRESENTED to the STRASBOURG COURT of HUMAN RIGHTS and ONLINE and in NEWS CHANNELS:
KEY QUESTION THAT KEN GRUBB DODGE and REFUSE TO (re-)POST!
WHY DIDN'T KEN GRUBB CONFRONT HIS BARBUDDY JOHN ROBERTSON WITH THE QUESTION BELOW?
"WHY JOHN ROBERTSON REFUSED TO GO AND TESTIFY AGAINST ZEN TEKSTILS TAHIR ERTUG GÜNGÖR WHO JOHN ROBERTSON MET WITH the DIRECTOR AT SEVINC PASTANESI CAFE IN ALSANCAK IZMIR, AND AGREED WITH TAHIR ERTUG GÜNGÖR THAT THE MONEY JOHN ROBERTSON ADVANCED AT THAT MEEING (WHICH WAS RECORDED) WHERE TO BE PAID BACK WITH THE TRANSFER ON THE WAY INTO DENIZBANK, WHICH ZEN TEKSTIL LATER IMPOUNDED?"
AND STOPPED THE SCAM RIGHT THERE AND THEN, IF HE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE and COMPANIES MONEY???
ALL ACTIONS FROM KEN GRUBB, ATAKAN FAMILY and the TURKISH AUTHORITIES are AIMED AT STOPPING the INNOCENT CHILDS HUMAN RIGHTS and USE THE CHILD TO EXTORT THE DIRECTOR and HIDE THE WHOLE TRUTH.
ATAKAN family are now HIDING an INNOCENT CHILD in their attempts to HIDE the SCAM and CRIMINAL ACTIVITY and EXTORT the DIRECTOR!
ONCE AGAIN the LINK that REVEAL how ATAKAN family use an INNOCENT CHILD to HIDE the SCAM.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1#!/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1
TO BE CONTINUED... |
 |
|
|
Ken
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - Jan 03 2012 : 20:23:12
|
Hard to believe that they said nothing to you, the border police, the higher police headquarters, your embassy, after multiple trips to the border. Nobody ever said anything to you regarding why you were prohibited from leaving the country.
If somebody told you that same story, would you believe it? |
|
|
|
legalstories
666 Posts |
Posted - Jan 04 2012 : 03:29:50
|
KEN GRUBB quote:
"Hard to believe that they said nothing to you, the border police, the higher police headquarters, your embassy, after multiple trips to the border. Nobody ever said anything to you regarding why you were prohibited from leaving the country.
If somebody told you that same story, would you believe it?"
TRUTH:
YES IT IS HARD TO BELIEVE, and THAT IS WHY the DIRECTOR RECORDED ALL EVENTS in order to EXPOSE the CORRUPT TURKISH AUTHORITIES as well as KEN GRUBBS PART of the SCAM!
NOTE:
KEN GRUBB as a former AFOSI AGENT and INVESTIGATOR should NOT AVOID the very SUSPICIOUS FACT that
"IF THE TURKISH POLICE GAVE A REASON to the DIRECTOR WHY HE WAS DENIED to LEAVE TURKEY, then WHY DIDN'T the CORRUPT TURKISH AUTHOROTIES STATE the REASON in the COMMUNICATION with SWEDENS GENERAL CONSULATE, when they STATED THERE WAS NO TRAVEL BAN,
and WHY CAN'T / WON'T the CORRUPT TURKISH AUTHORTIES GIVE AN ANSWER to SWEDENS FOREIGN MINISTRY and PRESENT DOCUMENTATION explaining the REASON WHY the DIRECTOR WAS DENIED to LEAVE TURKEY,
as TURKEY WERE and ARE OBLIGED to by the HAGUE CONVENTION???
IF TURKEY DID PRESENT INFORMATION to SWEDENS FOREIGN MINISTRY,
then and ONLY then THEY COULD CONTEST the POSTED ALLEGATIONS of CORRUPTION.
KEY QUESTION THAT KEN GRUBB DODGE and REFUSE TO (re-)POST!
WHY DIDN'T KEN GRUBB CONFRONT HIS BARBUDDY JOHN ROBERTSON WITH THE QUESTION BELOW?
"WHY JOHN ROBERTSON REFUSED TO GO AND TESTIFY AGAINST ZEN TEKSTILS TAHIR ERTUG GÜNGÖR WHO JOHN ROBERTSON MET WITH the DIRECTOR AT SEVINC PASTANESI CAFE IN ALSANCAK IZMIR, AND AGREED WITH TAHIR ERTUG GÜNGÖR THAT THE MONEY JOHN ROBERTSON ADVANCED AT THAT MEEING (WHICH WAS RECORDED) WHERE TO BE PAID BACK WITH THE TRANSFER ON THE WAY INTO DENIZBANK, WHICH ZEN TEKSTIL LATER IMPOUNDED?"
AND STOPPED THE SCAM RIGHT THERE AND THEN, IF HE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE and COMPANIES MONEY???
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT KEN GRUBB DO NOT WANT TO ANSWER (or re-post his claimed previous answer) THE KEY QUESTION ABOVE and YOU CAN ALL UNDERSTAND THAT HE IS TRYING to HIDE HIS and HIS BARBUDDYS PART of the SCAM.
EVIDENCE of KEN GRUBB LIES:
KEN GRUBB post:
I knew your account was blocked because you told me, and that was AFTER I loaned you all of that money.
HERE IS an EXTRACT from KEN GRUBBS POST DATED 20071104 at 13:15:41
"I'm now sorry to say that I helped him re-start his business after his bank account was frozen by the courts in Izmir, apparently over a dispute with him not paying some local companies for goods received (that's another story that I don't have enough information on to write about).
THE LIES ARE EVIDENT...
KEN GRUBB and HIS ACCOMPLISHES WILL BE SERVED in 2012, DESPITE the CORRUPT TURKISH AUTHORITIES RELUCTANCE to HONOUR the HAGUE CONVENTION and ASSIST INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES.
THE FULL DOCUMENTATION WILL BE POSTED HERE TO EXPOSE the TURKISH AUTHORITES and HOW KEN GRUBB HAS LIED ABOUT the PROSECUTOR in TURKEY CLOSING the FILE with the ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HIM.
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
WHY DOESN'T KEN GRUBB ASK EVEN ONE SIMPLE QUESTION to DEFNE ATAKAN,
WHICH COURT THAT TOLD HER THEY HAD BLOCKED THE DIRECTORS PASSPORT,
as HER E-mail STATE?
VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE:
WHAT POSSIBLE REASON (IF IT ISN'T EXTORTION of and FORCING the director to come to Turkey) CAN EXPLAIN THAT DEFNE ATAKAN ONLY ALLOW the INNOCENT CHILD to HAVE CONTACT with the father IN TURKEY, BUT REFUSE TO ALLOW THE CHILD TO HAVE CONTACT with the FATHER ON SKYPE or PHONE,
EVEN WITH A CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST, when the FATHER IS ALLOWED TO HAVE THE CHILD for the WEEKEND IN TURKEY WHITHOUT ANY PRESENCE from the authorities or the CRIMINAL MOTHER DEFNE ATAKAN???
ANSWER:
ATAKAN FAMILY and their CRIMINAL NETWORK and CORRUPT AUTHORITIES USE THE INNOCENT CHILD TO EXTORT THE DIRECTOR and FORCE HIM TO COME TO TURKEY, WHERE THEY ONCE AGAIN CAN
THREATEN, ASSAULT and EVEN KILL HIM to HIDE the SCAM
ALL ACTIONS FROM KEN GRUBB, ATAKAN FAMILY and the TURKISH AUTHORITIES are AIMED AT STOPPING the INNOCENT CHILDS HUMAN RIGHTS and USE THE CHILD TO EXTORT THE DIRECTOR and HIDE THE WHOLE TRUTH.
ATAKAN family are now HIDING an INNOCENT CHILD in their attempts to HIDE the SCAM and CRIMINAL ACTIVITY and EXTORT the DIRECTOR!
ONCE AGAIN the LINK that REVEAL how ATAKAN family use an INNOCENT CHILD to HIDE the SCAM.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1#!/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1
TO BE CONTINUED... |
|
|
|
Ken
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - Jan 05 2012 : 13:13:35
|
Did you know that it's now been five years since you conned me out of all my cash and savings?
Happy anniversary, Bjorn. |
|
|
|
oskar
Sweden
17 Posts |
Posted - Jan 05 2012 : 17:17:08
|
5 years, thats nice, congratulations. I myself parted with Björn about 7 years ago.
First I want to thank Ken for a very entertaining read, although Björn's replies are mostly boring big letters in bright colors. I think it's fantastic that you've managed to keep this up for so long, and I thank you for it. I'm sorry that you lost money, but that's not really what this is about anymore, right?
When I first read your story, I felt a little bit guilty, since I wrote the software that Björn used to sell his scam, but in my defense I believed in Björns words too once and the I had a couple of court cases regarding Björn, and I didn't want to give him anything to use against me by writing on the internet.
I would just like to make something clear about the software situation.
During 2004 I developed patternstyler in a company called Gatewear Group AB. The contract between me an GGAB was not clear, and therefore I didn't let go of the source code before I got paid (Björn had lied to me too many times). In 2006 (might have been fall 2005) Björn tried to use the swedish bailiff (kronofogden) to get me to hand over the source code, long story short, it went to court, where the decision was that I didn't have any obligations to give up the source code.
When GGAB went bankrupt (still 2006, a couple of more court cases later) The attorney/lawyer who handled the case (konkursförvaltaren) asked me for the source code. Now we're at spring 2007, The attorney an I came to an agreement the I would be paid, not for the code, but for the work to put it all together on a CD an send it to him. As I understand it Björn later bought the source code from the failed company (GGAB in bankruptcy), so I can't see why he's whining about a former employee (me) keeping the source code.
So, in conclusion, The source code for the software has always been available to GGAB, the problem (for Björn) was that he didn't pay the people that actually worked.
BTW Björn, if you haven't changed your passwords by now (it's been almost 7 years), do it today. You don't wan't me sending emails to your customers. |
|
|
|
legalstories
666 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 03:35:34
|
AS YOU CAN ALL SEE HOW KEN GRUBB CONTINUE TO DODGE ALL FACTS THAT EXPOSE ATAKAN FAMILY, their CRIMINAL NETWORK and CORRUPT AUTHORITIES and KEN GRUBBS LIES, WHO ALL use the INNOCENT CHILD TO:
- EXTORT the DIRECTOR
- USE THE DEBT PAPERS YÜKSEL ATAKAN and the
"lawyer" MEHMET FATIH TOKSAL
Izmir Barosu No: 5753 http://www.fatihtoksal.av.tr HAD FORCED the
DIRECTOR TO SIGN TO A PERSON the DIRECTOR HAD NEVER MET; DIDN'T
KNOW the IDENTITY OF and HAD NEVER HAD ANY RELATION TO WHATSOEVER or
THEY WOULD NOT ALLOW THE DIRECTOR TO SEE HIS INNOCENT CHILD
- QUICKLY HAVE THE CORRUPT COURT TO RULE IN A DIVORCE CASE,
WITHOUT ALLOWING the DIRECTOR the right to A FAIR TRIAL
and LATER REFER TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION TO HAVE THE COURTS DECISION
ACKNOWLEDGED IN EUROPE.
- STEAL the SOFTWARE RIGHTS and BUSINESS
AND HIDE THE SCAM...
VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE:
WHAT POSSIBLE REASON CAN EXPLAIN THAT DEFNE ATAKAN ONLY ALLOW the INNOCENT CHILD to HAVE CONTACT with HIS FATHER IN TURKEY, BUT REFUSE TO ALLOW THE CHILD TO HAVE CONTACT with the FATHER ON SKYPE or PHONE,
EVEN WITH A CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST, when the FATHER IS ALLOWED TO HAVE THE CHILD for the WEEKEND IN TURKEY WHITHOUT ANY PRESENCE from the authorities or the CRIMINAL MOTHER DEFNE ATAKAN???
ANSWER:
ATAKAN FAMILY and their CRIMINAL NETWORK and CORRUPT AUTHORITIES USE THE INNOCENT CHILD TO EXTORT THE DIRECTOR and FORCE HIM TO COME TO TURKEY, WHERE THEY ONCE AGAIN CAN
THREATEN, ASSAULT and EVEN KILL HIM to HIDE the SCAM
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
WHY DOESN'T KEN GRUBB ASK EVEN ONE SIMPLE QUESTION to DEFNE ATAKAN,
WHICH COURT THAT TOLD HER THEY HAD BLOCKED THE DIRECTORS PASSPORT,
as HER E-mail STATE?
KEN GRUBB quote:
"Did you know that it's now been five years since you conned me out of all my cash and savings?"
KEY QUESTION THAT KEN GRUBB DODGE and REFUSE TO (re-)POST!
WHY DIDN'T KEN GRUBB CONFRONT HIS BARBUDDY JOHN ROBERTSON WITH THE QUESTION BELOW?
"WHY JOHN ROBERTSON REFUSED TO GO AND TESTIFY AGAINST ZEN TEKSTILS TAHIR ERTUG GÜNGÖR WHO JOHN ROBERTSON MET WITH the DIRECTOR AT SEVINC PASTANESI CAFE IN ALSANCAK IZMIR, AND AGREED WITH TAHIR ERTUG GÜNGÖR THAT THE MONEY JOHN ROBERTSON ADVANCED AT THAT MEEING (WHICH WAS RECORDED) WHERE TO BE PAID BACK WITH THE TRANSFER ON THE WAY INTO DENIZBANK, WHICH ZEN TEKSTIL LATER IMPOUNDED?"
AND STOPPED THE SCAM RIGHT THERE AND THEN, IF HE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT HIS OWN and OTHER PEOPLE and COMPANIES MONEY???
OSAKR JOHANSSON quote:
"When I first read your story, I felt a little bit guilty, since I wrote the software that Björn used to sell his scam, but in my defense I believed in Björns words too once and the I had a couple of court cases regarding Björn, and I didn't want to give him anything to use against me by writing on the internet.
I would just like to make something clear about the software situation.
During 2004 I developed patternstyler in a company called Gatewear Group AB. The contract between me an GGAB was not clear, and therefore I didn't let go of the source code before I got paid (Björn had lied to me too many times). In 2006 (might have been fall 2005) Björn tried to use the swedish bailiff (kronofogden) to get me to hand over the source code, long story short, it went to court, where the decision was that I didn't have any obligations to give up the source code.
When GGAB went bankrupt (still 2006, a couple of more court cases later) The attorney/lawyer who handled the case (konkursförvaltaren) asked me for the source code. Now we're at spring 2007, The attorney an I came to an agreement the I would be paid, not for the code, but for the work to put it all together on a CD an send it to him. As I understand it Björn later bought the source code from the failed company (GGAB in bankruptcy), so I can't see why he's whining about a former employee (me) keeping the source code.
So, in conclusion, The source code for the software has always been available to GGAB, the problem (for Björn) was that he didn't pay the people that actually worked."
TRUTH:
AS YOU CAN SEE OSKAR JOHANSSON IS LYING THROUGH HIS TEETH!
First he claims he was entitled to hold onto the source coce,
then HE ADMITS that the lawyer requested the source code from him,
which the DOCUMENTAION CONFIRM without giving OSKAR JOHANSSON any money for the CODE, but ONLY for putting it on a CD.
OSKAR JOHANSSON AVOID TO MENTION that
- HE HIMSELF WAS A PARTNER of the company
- HAS FAILED TO RETURN and EMBEZZLED PRIVATE PROPERTY (KEYBOOARDS) of
the director, WHICH HE HAS SOLD WITHOUT THE PERMISSION or EVEN
ASKING and WILL BE FACING PROSECUTION for.
- OSKAR JOHANSSON failed to deliver the software ACCORDING to
the agreement and WAS DELAYED which CAUSED SEVERE FINANCIAL DAMAGE
to the COMPANY and CLIENTS.
YOU WILL BE PRESENTED with a DOCUMENT from a meeting with the PARTNERS
(especially OSKAR JOHANSSON) were OSKAR JOHANSSON GUARANTEE TIME of DELIVERY and MORE.
YOU WILL ALSO BE PRESENTED with the AGREEMENT with OSKAR JOHANSSON which CLEARLY STATE that HE IS ONLY ENTITLED TO PAYMENT IF HE DELIVER the SOFTWARE and SOURCE CODE which HE DIDN'T.
IF OSKAR JOHANSSON WAS ENTITLED TO HOLD ONTO the SDURCE CODE, then
the lawyer WOUDN'T HAVE REQUESTED OSKAR JOHANSSON to HAND IT OVER!
VERY IMPORTANT OKSAR JOHANSSON quote:
"BTW Björn, if you haven't changed your passwords by now (it's been almost 7 years), do it today. You don't wan't me sending emails to your customers."
ANSWER:
OSKAR JOHANSSON ADMIT THAT HE WOULDN'T HESITATE to COMMIT YET ANOTHER
CRIME by ACCESSING INFORMATION that DOESN'T BELONG TO HIM and THEREBY COMMIT COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, COMPANY ESPIONAGE and USE the ILLEGALLY RETRIEVED INFORMATION to DEFAME the director and COMPANY.
OSKAR JOHANSSON WILL BE FACING CHARGES from the PROSECUTORS OFFICE and LITIGATION from the DIRECTOR and COMPANY.
ALL ACTIONS FROM KEN GRUBB, ATAKAN FAMILY and the TURKISH AUTHORITIES are AIMED AT STOPPING the INNOCENT CHILDS HUMAN RIGHTS and USE THE CHILD TO EXTORT THE DIRECTOR and HIDE THE WHOLE TRUTH.
ATAKAN family are now HIDING an INNOCENT CHILD in their attempts to HIDE the SCAM and CRIMINAL ACTIVITY and EXTORT the DIRECTOR!
ONCE AGAIN the LINK that REVEAL how ATAKAN family use an INNOCENT CHILD to HIDE the SCAM.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1#!/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1
TO BE CONTINUED... |
|
|
|
Ken
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 08:05:15
|
Oskar, I remember that. Maybe that's where the money went, paying Bjorn's legal expenses.
Bjorn, you said you had a bank transfer in progress and that I would be paid the following week, a sure thing. That was five years ago.
Lately you have said that your bank account was blocked at the time.
You took all of my cash and savings, and caused me to incur massive debts from paying your bills. I was trying to help you. And I never took any money from you.
So who is the scam or con artist here? |
|
|
|
legalstories
666 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 10:34:31
|
AS YOU CAN ALL SEE HOW KEN GRUBB CONTINUE TO DODGE ALL FACTS THAT EXPOSE ATAKAN FAMILY, their CRIMINAL NETWORK and CORRUPT AUTHORITIES and KEN GRUBBS LIES, WHO ALL use the INNOCENT CHILD TO:
- EXTORT the DIRECTOR
- USE THE DEBT PAPERS YÜKSEL ATAKAN and the
"lawyer" MEHMET FATIH TOKSAL
Izmir Barosu No: 5753 http://www.fatihtoksal.av.tr HAD FORCED the
DIRECTOR TO SIGN TO A PERSON the DIRECTOR HAD NEVER MET, DIDN'T
KNOW the IDENTITY OF and HAD NEVER HAD ANY RELATION TO WHATSOEVER or
THEY WOULD NOT ALLOW THE DIRECTOR TO SEE HIS INNOCENT CHILD
(which YOU CAN ALL SEE THEY STILL DON'T from the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS)
- QUICKLY HAVE THE CORRUPT COURT TO RULE IN A DIVORCE CASE,
WITHOUT ALLOWING the DIRECTOR the right to A FAIR TRIAL
and LATER REFER TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION TO HAVE THE COURTS DECISION
ACKNOWLEDGED IN EUROPE.
- STEAL the SOFTWARE RIGHTS and BUSINESS
- HIDE THAT THEY TRIED TO "BUY" THE SOFTWARE with a EURO 10.000.000
STOLEN CHEQUE from BBL BANK
- HIDE THAT THEY OPENDED a FAKE EURO 2.000.000 L/C from AZALBANK to
SWEDBANK to "BUY" the SOFTWARE RIGHTS in a COUNTRY
AND HIDE THE SCAM...
smorgasbord quote:
" I assume you are suggesting that her (Defne's) family "got to" the police? Possible ! Such families have been known to do such things!"
"People with power either political or economic often abuse that power and have been known to influence various arms of the state!"
DEFNE ATAKAN http://www.defneatakan.com (alias truth) QUOTES:
"WHAT BUSINESS????????????????????BJORN HAD A BALOON WITH NOTHING INSIDE!!!NO BIG TURKISH COMPANIES HAD ANY INTEREST IN HIM THEY DIDNT TAKE HIM SERIOUS AFTER SEEING THAT ALL THE SCENE WAS AN EMPTY DREAM!BUT BJORN CHEATED MANY PEAPLE WITH THIS BALOON!!WHAT IS HE DOING NOW???WHO IS INVESTING IN HIM!!!WHY WHOULD HIS EXWIFE'S FAMILY RUIN HIS BUSINESS,HE IS THE FATHER OF THEIR GRANDSON!!!!THEY ARE RICH AND HONEST PEAPLE!!!!!!"
""ne biliyormus izmir defne atakan hakkýnda!anlar bakalým birdost!delikanlýysan adýný da ver de aslanlar gibi gel meydana!hangi aile ve kim icin konustugunun farkinda misin!onlar hakkinda yorum yapabilecek biri misin! bjornle iliþkin mi var da avukatlik yapiyorsun!belli ki onun seviyesindesin..konusabilecek kriterin varsa da aslan gibi meydana çýk,yýrtýk dondan degil!"
THE MULTIPLE EVIDENCE incl. COMMUNICATION from
- EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
- SWEDENS FOREIGN MINISTRY
- REUNITE http://www.reunite.org
- EU LAWYERS
as well as VIDEO and SOUND RECORDINGS, SMS and e-mails STATE THE CRIMINAL FACE of ATAKAN FAMILY and HOW THEY and TURKEY use an
INNOCENT CHILD to EXTORT the DIRECTOR and HIDE the SCAM!
VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE:
WHAT POSSIBLE REASON CAN EXPLAIN THAT DEFNE ATAKAN ONLY ALLOW the INNOCENT CHILD to HAVE CONTACT with HIS FATHER IN TURKEY, BUT REFUSE TO ALLOW THE CHILD TO HAVE CONTACT with the FATHER ON SKYPE or PHONE,
EVEN WITH A CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST, when the FATHER IS ALLOWED TO HAVE THE CHILD for the WEEKEND IN TURKEY WHITHOUT ANY PRESENCE from the authorities or the CRIMINAL MOTHER DEFNE ATAKAN???
ANSWER:
ATAKAN FAMILY and their CRIMINAL NETWORK and CORRUPT AUTHORITIES USE THE INNOCENT CHILD TO EXTORT THE DIRECTOR and FORCE HIM TO COME TO TURKEY, WHERE THEY ONCE AGAIN CAN
THREATEN, ASSAULT and EVEN KILL HIM to HIDE the SCAM
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
WHY DOESN'T KEN GRUBB ASK EVEN ONE SIMPLE QUESTION to DEFNE ATAKAN, WHICH COURT THAT TOLD HER THEY HAD BLOCKED THE DIRECTORS PASSPORT, as HER E-mail STATE? IT WAS THE VERY SAME TIME as WHEN OSKAR JOHANSSON REFUSED TO DELIVER THE SOURCE CODE, and KEN GRUBBS BARBUDDY JOHN ROBERTSON and CON MAN CONRAD ICER POSTED LIES on the INTERNET CLAIMING
"NOBODY WOULD PRODUCE for GATEWEAR"
KEN GRUBB quote:
"Now I know why you wanted me to fly to Europe to deliver some of your products...Luke did it for you."
and THE VERY SAME TIME REHA ATAKAN, who were later SENTENCED to 6 MONTHS PROBATIONARY PRISON for ASSAULT and DEATH THREATS on the DIRECTOR in FRONT OF ALL CHILDREN,
HAD EMBEZZLED GATEWEAR GROUP AB (company OSKAR JOHANSSON refer to)
- COMPUTER
- BOOK KEEPING
- PATENT INFORMATION
- CLIENT and ORDER INFORMATION
C
and MORE after HIS FRIENDS HAD ONCE AGAIN FAILED PRODUCTIONS, which YOU HAVE BEEN PRESENTED the PICTORIAL EVIDENCE of,
and REHA ATAKAN was WELL INFORMED by a FINANCIAL PARTNER of GATEWEAR by e-mail that GATEWEAR HAD AN AMAZING BUSINESS SOLUTION,
and PRODUCTIONS and FINANCIALS were SECURED in CHINA?
KEN GRUBB quote:
"You told me that someone took your computer and records"
""Yes, I was aware of production problems. We talked about them a lot."
"
I didn't know you were assaulted. In fact I know very little about this whole intrigue, I can only assume there is a lot more behind the scenes than I know."
"Oskar, I remember that. Maybe that's where the money went, paying Bjorn's legal expenses.
Bjorn, you said you had a bank transfer in progress and that I would be paid the following week, a sure thing. That was five years ago.
Lately you have said that your bank account was blocked at the time.
You took all of my cash and savings, and caused me to incur massive debts from paying your bills. I was trying to help you. And I never took any money from you.
So who is the scam or con artist here?"
"You have said that I have lied in my posts about you. Now, beyond obvious joking in the face of your posts (which are also a joke), how have I lied? What did I take out of context? And what did I do which was illegal, unethical, or immoral?"
TRUTH:
KEN GRUBB IS ONCE AGAIN LYING HIS *SS OFF!
KEN GRUBB post:
I knew your account was blocked because you told me, and that was AFTER I loaned you all of that money.
HERE IS an EXTRACT from KEN GRUBBS POST DATED 20071104 at 13:15:41
"I'm now sorry to say that I helped him re-start his business after his bank account was frozen by the courts in Izmir, apparently over a dispute with him not paying some local companies for goods received (that's another story that I don't have enough information on to write about).
THE LIES ARE EVIDENT...
KEN GRUBB WERE ALSO WELL AWARE that OSKAR JOHANSSON REFUSED TO DELIVER the SOURCE CODE.
EXTRACT of KEN GRUBB 2007104 POST
"Unfortunately, Bjorn didn't have the source code for the software, because a former worker claimed that it was his property."
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
OSKAR JOHANSSON WAS LATER FORCED to DELIVER the SOURCE CODE BY A LAWYER APPOINTED by the SWEDISH AUTHORITIES!
OSKAR JOHANSSON quote:
"When GGAB went bankrupt (still 2006, a couple of more court cases later) The attorney/lawyer who handled the case (konkursförvaltaren) asked me for the source code. Now we're at spring 2007, The attorney an I came to an agreement the I would be paid, not for the code, but for the work to put it all together on a CD an send it to him. "
WHICH REVEAL two (2) VERY IMPORTANT THINGS.
1: OSKAR JOHANSSON and his friend NIKLAS RAMBERG were NOT EMPLOYEES of
GATEWEAR GROUP AB, which the communication and documentation from
the lawyer who handled the bankrupcy CONFIRM.
2: IF OSKAR JOHANSSON WOULD HAVE BEEN an EMPLOYEE, HE WOULDN'T HAVE
HAD ANY RIGHT to HOLD ONTO the SOURCE CODE, but HE COULD HAVE
AKSED the bailiffs (KRONOFOGDEN) to ENFORCE the company (which he
and NIKLAS RAMBERG were PARTNERS of) to PAY HIM "SALARY"
(IF HE WAS AN EMPLOYEE) or PUT THE COMPANY into bankrupcy and
CLAIM COMPENSATION for up to 3 MONTHS by the government.
KEY QUESTION:
WHY DID OSKAR JOHANSSON AGREE TO HAND OVER the SOURCE CODE to the lawyer WITHOUT BEING PAID FOR IT, IF HE COULD PROVE IT WAS HIS PROPERTY???
KEN GRUBB quote:
"I never claimed that you paid no money to John. I did say that you hadn't repaid John in full, and from what I understand, you still haven't repaid him in full. From what I understand, you did pay him back, partially, and transferred money through the defunct Business Unity bank account after your bank account was blocked by the Turkish courts because of a previous failure (on your part) to pay one of your suppliers."
KEY QUESTION THAT KEN GRUBB DODGE and REFUSE TO (re-)POST!
WHY DIDN'T KEN GRUBB CONFRONT HIS BARBUDDY JOHN ROBERTSON WITH THE QUESTION BELOW?
"WHY JOHN ROBERTSON REFUSED TO GO AND TESTIFY AGAINST ZEN TEKSTILS TAHIR ERTUG GÜNGÖR WHO JOHN ROBERTSON MET WITH the DIRECTOR AT SEVINC PASTANESI CAFE IN ALSANCAK IZMIR, AND AGREED WITH TAHIR ERTUG GÜNGÖR THAT THE MONEY JOHN ROBERTSON ADVANCED AT THAT MEEING (WHICH WAS RECORDED) WHERE TO BE PAID BACK WITH THE TRANSFER ON THE WAY INTO DENIZBANK, WHICH ZEN TEKSTIL LATER IMPOUNDED?"
THAT WOULD HAVE ENABLED GATEWEAR to ACCESS MONEY and SECURE PAYMENTS INSTEAD of KEN GRUBB, JOHN ROBERTSON, CONRAD ICER,
FUAT YILMAZ and ESPECIALLY ATAKAN FAMILY, ASSISTING CRIMINAL MANUFACTURERS like ZEN TEKSTIL who FAILED PRODUCTIONS and EVEN SENT BAD GOODS to the WRONG COUNTRY for the 2006 FIFA WORLD CUP to PARTNER with DEFNE ATAKAN and USE AN INNOCENT CHILD to EXTORT the DIRECTOR and STEAL MONEY for FAILED WORK NOT MEETING THE REQUIRED STANDARDS of GATEWEAR and the CUSTOMERS which the DOCUMENTATION CONFIRM,
AND STOPPED THE SCAM RIGHT THERE AND THEN, IF HE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT HIS OWN and OTHER PEOPLE and COMPANIES MONEY???
BUSINESS UNITY e-mail copy:
"I can confirm that while at BusinessUnity , we made a number of transfers from the BusinessUnity account to John Robertson, on behalf of Gatewear
I do not have access to the numbers or dates, but I believe they took place some time in 2007
If I can gain access to the bank statements I will forward on the details"
KEN GRUBB AVOID to QUESTION the FACT that ALL EVENTS has SYNCHRONIZED DATES, and has been performed SYNCHRONIZED, and the VERY SAME PEOPLE APPEAR in:
- e-mails
- recordings
- signed faxes
- court testimonies and more...
HOW DID KEN GRUBB SEE BUSINESS BEING MADE, WHEN HE WAS WELL AWARE OF ALL THE INFORMATION ABOUT:
- GATEWEARS BANK ACCOUNTS WERE BLOCKED?
- PRODUCTIONS SABOTAGED?
- THE DIRECTOR ILLEGALLY BEING DENIED TO LEAVE TURKEY AND MEET
CUSTOMERS AND ACCESS MONEY AND SECURE PRODUCTIONS IN CHINA AFTER
THE TURKISH FAILURES and SABOTAGE?
- HIS BARBUDDY JOHN ROBERTSON and CONRAD ICER POSTING DEFAMING
INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET WHEN THEY WERE WELL AWARE OF THE SCAM
INSTEAD OF TESTIFYING AGAINST ZEN TEKSTIL?
WHICH PUT GATEWEAR IN AN IMPOSSIBLE SITUATION, WHICH KEN GRUBB WAS WELL AWARE OF AND ASSISTED THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE SCAM WITH HIS
INCOMPLETE POST TAKEN OUT OF ITS CONTEXT IN 2007, IN WHICH KEN GRUBB LEFT OUT ALL THE VITAL INFORMATION ABOVE.
KEN GRUBB quote:
"Finally, as a warning to others who might do business with Bjorn and suffer the same fate as I, I posted about my experience, right here in Businesses from Hell. I told the story about what Bjorn did to me and what I observed him do while doing business with Gatewear."
QUESTION TO KEN GRUBB from 100+ CUSTOMERS of GATEWEAR:
WHY DID KEN GRUBB LEAVE OUT THE CRUCIAL INFORMATION ABOVE IN HIS 2007 POST and WHY HAS KEN GRUBB LIED ABOUT HIS KNOWLEDGE of GATEWEARS SITUATION
[red][size=6]ALL ACTIONS FROM KEN GRUBB, ATAKAN FAMILY and the TURKISH AUTHORITIES are AIMED AT STOPPING the INNOCENT CHILDS HUMAN RIGHTS and USE THE CHILD TO EXTORT THE DIRECTOR and HIDE THE WHOLE TRUTH.
ATAKAN family are now HIDING an INNOCENT CHILD in their attempts to HIDE the SCAM and CRIMINAL ACTIVITY and EXTORT the DIRECTOR!
ONCE AGAIN the LINK that REVEAL how ATAKAN family use an INNOCENT CHILD to HIDE the SCAM.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1#!/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1
[b]
TO BE CONTINUED... |
|
|
|
oskar
Sweden
17 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 12:25:48
|
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
OSKAR JOHANSSON WAS LATER FORCED to DELIVER the SOURCE CODE BY A LAWYER APPOINTED by the SWEDISH AUTHORITIES!
No, the ownership of the source code was never settled in court, the court only ruled that I didn't have to give the source code to you. In a later court case, I did try to get money from the bankrupt company, but the court ruled that I wasn't entitled to the money because of the 3 month you mentioned. They never ruled on whether I was an employee or a contractor, instead they said that since more than 3 month had past between the work I did and the bankruptcy, either way I wasn't entitled to any money.
I wasn't forced to deliver the source code, I was asked to do so. Since the source code was worth nothing to me (I figured you would never pay me), and I was fed up with the whole affair, I decided to be nice and just give the source code to the bankrupt company (knowing that you would at least have to pay to get it).
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
OSKAR JOHANSSON quote:
"When GGAB went bankrupt (still 2006, a couple of more court cases later) The attorney/lawyer who handled the case (konkursförvaltaren) asked me for the source code. Now we're at spring 2007, The attorney an I came to an agreement the I would be paid,[not for the code, but for the work to put it all together on a CD an send it to him. "
WHICH REVEAL two (2) VERY IMPORTANT THINGS.
1: OSKAR JOHANSSON and his friend ------ were NOT EMPLOYEES of
GATEWEAR GROUP AB, which the communication and documentation from
the lawyer who handled the bankrupcy CONFIRM.
2: IF OSKAR JOHANSSON WOULD HAVE BEEN an EMPLOYEE, HE WOULDN'T HAVE
HAD ANY RIGHT to HOLD ONTO the SOURCE CODE, but HE COULD HAVE
AKSED the bailiffs (KRONOFOGDEN) to ENFORCE the company (which he
and ------ were PARTNERS of) to PAY HIM "SALARY"
(IF HE WAS AN EMPLOYEE) or PUT THE COMPANY into bankrupcy and
CLAIM COMPENSATION for up to 3 MONTHS by the government.
I think I answered this above. The court never ruled if I were an employee or not. I, still today, don't know if I were an emplyee.
No need to name people who hasn't done anything wrong, and doesn't participate in this discussion.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
KEY QUESTION:
WHY DID OSKAR JOHANSSON AGREE TO HAND OVER the SOURCE CODE to the lawyer WITHOUT BEING PAID FOR IT, IF HE COULD PROVE IT WAS HIS PROPERTY???
I gave the source code to the lawyer because he asked for it nice, he did't threaten to sue me (like you did), and he was willing to pay for the work to assemble the code from my backups. I was also fed up with Gatewear and wanted to move on with my life. The source code was also over 2 years old when this happened, and I figured it was worthless to me.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
AS YOU CAN SEE OSKAR JOHANSSON IS LYING THROUGH HIS TEETH!
First he claims he was entitled to hold onto the source coce,
then HE ADMITS that the lawyer requested the source code from him,
which the DOCUMENTAION CONFIRM without giving OSKAR JOHANSSON any money for the CODE, but ONLY for putting it on a CD.
I never claimed that I was entitled to hold on to the source code, I claimed that I wasn't obliged to give it to you.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
OSKAR JOHANSSON AVOID TO MENTION that
- HE HIMSELF WAS A PARTNER of the company
- HAS FAILED TO RETURN and EMBEZZLED PRIVATE PROPERTY (KEYBOOARDS) of
the director, WHICH HE HAS SOLD WITHOUT THE PERMISSION or EVEN
ASKING and WILL BE FACING PROSECUTION for.
Those charges were dropped, you're welcome to file a new accusation against me to the police if you want. The charges was regarding one keyboard.
I tried to return the other keyboard (that I borrowed from you after I sold the one you gave me) to you, but you were never available to collect it.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
- OSKAR JOHANSSON failed to deliver the software ACCORDING to
the agreement and WAS DELAYED which CAUSED SEVERE FINANCIAL DAMAGE
to the COMPANY and CLIENTS.
So sue me, oops you already did, and lost.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
YOU WILL BE PRESENTED with a DOCUMENT from a meeting with the PARTNERS
(especially OSKAR JOHANSSON) were OSKAR JOHANSSON GUARANTEE TIME of DELIVERY and MORE.
Are you talking about one of the documents that was presented in the court case, where the court ruled in my favor (not having to give you the source code)?
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
YOU WILL ALSO BE PRESENTED with the AGREEMENT with OSKAR JOHANSSON which CLEARLY STATE that HE IS ONLY ENTITLED TO PAYMENT IF HE DELIVER the SOFTWARE and SOURCE CODE which HE DIDN'T.
So everything is great. You did't get the source code, I did't get paid. Everybody is happy. |
|
|
|
oskar
Sweden
17 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 12:33:29
|
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
OSKAR JOHANSSON ADMIT THAT HE WOULDN'T HESITATE to COMMIT YET ANOTHER
CRIME by ACCESSING INFORMATION that DOESN'T BELONG TO HIM and THEREBY COMMIT COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, COMPANY ESPIONAGE and USE the ILLEGALLY RETRIEVED INFORMATION to DEFAME the director and COMPANY.
OSKAR JOHANSSON WILL BE FACING CHARGES from the PROSECUTORS OFFICE and LITIGATION from the DIRECTOR and COMPANY.
No, I never said I would do anything illegal, I just pointed out that it is wise to change passwords before you sue the person who has been in charge of your databases, websites, software development, etc.
|
|
|
|
legalstories
666 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 14:22:08
|
YOU CAN ALL SEE HOW KEN GRUBB, OSKAR JOHANSSON and ATAKAN FAMILY and their CRIMINAL NETWORK and ACCOMPLISHES CONTINUE TO DODGE ALL FACTS THAT EXPOSE ATAKAN FAMILY, their CRIMINAL NETWORK and CORRUPT AUTHORITIES and KEN GRUBBS LIES, and use the INNOCENT CHILD TO:
- EXTORT the DIRECTOR
- USE THE DEBT PAPERS YÜKSEL ATAKAN and the
"lawyer" MEHMET FATIH TOKSAL
Izmir Barosu No: 5753 http://www.fatihtoksal.av.tr HAD FORCED the
DIRECTOR TO SIGN TO A PERSON the DIRECTOR HAD NEVER MET, DIDN'T
KNOW the IDENTITY OF and HAD NEVER HAD ANY RELATION TO WHATSOEVER or
THEY WOULD NOT ALLOW THE DIRECTOR TO SEE HIS INNOCENT CHILD
(which YOU CAN ALL SEE THEY STILL DON'T from the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS)
- QUICKLY HAVE THE CORRUPT COURT TO RULE IN A DIVORCE CASE, WITHOUT ALLOWING the DIRECTOR the right to A FAIR TRIAL
and LATER REFER TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION TO HAVE THE COURTS DECISION
ACKNOWLEDGED IN EUROPE.
- STEAL the SOFTWARE RIGHTS and BUSINESS
- HIDE THAT THEY TRIED TO "BUY" THE SOFTWARE with a EURO 10.000.000
STOLEN CHEQUE from BBL BANK
- HIDE THAT THEY OPENDED a FAKE EURO 2.000.000 L/C from AZALBANK to
SWEDBANK to "BUY" the SOFTWARE RIGHTS in a COUNTRY
AND HIDE THE SCAM...
THE MULTIPLE EVIDENCE incl. COMMUNICATION from
- EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
- SWEDENS FOREIGN MINISTRY
- REUNITE http://www.reunite.org
- EU LAWYERS
as well as VIDEO and SOUND RECORDINGS, SMS and e-mails STATE THE CRIMINAL FACE of ATAKAN FAMILY and HOW THEY and TURKEY use an
INNOCENT CHILD to EXTORT the DIRECTOR and HIDE the SCAM!
VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE:
WHAT POSSIBLE REASON CAN EXPLAIN THAT DEFNE ATAKAN ONLY ALLOW the INNOCENT CHILD to HAVE CONTACT with HIS FATHER IN TURKEY, BUT REFUSE TO ALLOW THE CHILD TO HAVE CONTACT with the FATHER ON SKYPE or PHONE,
EVEN WITH A CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST, when the FATHER IS ALLOWED TO HAVE THE CHILD for the WEEKEND IN TURKEY WHITHOUT ANY PRESENCE from the authorities or the CRIMINAL MOTHER DEFNE ATAKAN???
ANSWER:
ATAKAN FAMILY and their CRIMINAL NETWORK and CORRUPT AUTHORITIES USE THE INNOCENT CHILD TO EXTORT THE DIRECTOR and FORCE HIM TO COME TO TURKEY, WHERE THEY ONCE AGAIN CAN
THREATEN, ASSAULT and EVEN KILL HIM to HIDE the SCAM
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
WHY DOESN'T KEN GRUBB ASK EVEN ONE SIMPLE QUESTION to DEFNE ATAKAN, WHICH COURT THAT TOLD HER THEY HAD BLOCKED THE DIRECTORS PASSPORT, as HER E-mail STATE?
IT WAS THE VERY SAME TIME as WHEN OSKAR JOHANSSON REFUSED TO DELIVER THE SOURCE CODE, and KEN GRUBBS BARBUDDY JOHN ROBERTSON and CON MAN CONRAD ICER POSTED LIES on the INTERNET CLAIMING
"NOBODY WOULD PRODUCE for GATEWEAR"
KEN GRUBB quote:
"Now I know why you wanted me to fly to Europe to deliver some of your products...Luke did it for you."
and THE VERY SAME TIME REHA ATAKAN, who were later SENTENCED to 6 MONTHS PROBATIONARY PRISON for ASSAULT and DEATH THREATS on the DIRECTOR in FRONT OF ALL CHILDREN,
HAD EMBEZZLED GATEWEAR GROUP AB (company OSKAR JOHANSSON refer to)
- COMPUTER
- BOOK KEEPING
- PATENT INFORMATION
- CLIENT and ORDER INFORMATION
and MORE after HIS FRIENDS HAD ONCE AGAIN FAILED PRODUCTIONS, which YOU HAVE BEEN PRESENTED the PICTORIAL EVIDENCE of,
and REHA ATAKAN was WELL INFORMED by a FINANCIAL PARTNER of GATEWEAR by e-mail that GATEWEAR HAD AN AMAZING BUSINESS SOLUTION,
and PRODUCTIONS and FINANCIALS were SECURED in CHINA?
OSKAR JOHANSSON quote:
"Those charges were dropped, you're welcome to file a new accusation against me to the police if you want. The charges was regarding one keyboard.
I tried to return the other keyboard (that I borrowed from you after I sold the one you gave me) to you, but you were never available to collect it."
TRUTH:
The charges were ONLY dropped DUE TO FACT that the DIRECTOR was ILLEGALLY DENIED to LEAVE TURKEY and COULDN'T VISIT the POLICE in SWEDEN.
OSKAR JOHANSSON ADMIT THAT HE SOLD A KEYBOARD THAT DIDN'T BELONG TO HIM and NOW CLAIM IT WAS "GIVEN" TO HIM.
WELL THE POLICE and COURT WILL DEAL WITH IT,
based on the EVIDENCE AVAILABLE THAT CONFIRM OSKAR JOHANSSONS EMBEZZLEMENT.
quote:Originally posted by legalstories
YOU WILL BE PRESENTED with a DOCUMENT from a meeting with the PARTNERS
(especially OSKAR JOHANSSON) were OSKAR JOHANSSON GUARANTEE TIME of DELIVERY and MORE.
Are you talking about one of the documents that was presented in the court case, where the court ruled in my favor (not having to give you the source code)?
YOU WILL BE PRESENTED WITH A DOCUMENT from a MEETING with ALL PARTNERS and KEY PEOPLE of GATEWEAR, where OSKAR JOHANSSON GUARANTEED TIME of DELIVERY AGAIN AFTER HIS MASSIVE DELAYS, BUT ONCE AGAIN TURNED OUT OT BE LIES.
VERY IMPORTANT OSKAR JOHANSSON quote:
"BTW Björn, if you haven't changed your passwords by now (it's been almost 7 years), do it today. You don't wan't me sending emails to your customers."
uote:Originally posted by legalstories
OSKAR JOHANSSON ADMIT THAT HE WOULDN'T HESITATE to COMMIT YET ANOTHER
CRIME by ACCESSING INFORMATION that DOESN'T BELONG TO HIM and THEREBY COMMIT COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, COMPANY ESPIONAGE and USE the ILLEGALLY RETRIEVED INFORMATION to DEFAME the director and COMPANY.
OSKAR JOHANSSON WILL BE FACING CHARGES from the PROSECUTORS OFFICE and LITIGATION from the DIRECTOR and COMPANY.
No, I never said I would do anything illegal, I just pointed out that it is wise to change passwords before you sue the person who has been in charge of your databases, websites, software development, etc.
ANSWER:
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT OSKAR JOHANSSON INDICATE THAT HE WOULD ACCESS CUSTOMER INFORMATION and CONTACT DATA from the SYSTEM WHICH HE HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT TO, and USE IT TO CONTACT GATEWEAR CLIENTS and DEFAME the COMPANY and DIRECTOR.
OSKAR JOHANSSON WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO RETRIEVE the CUSTOMER INFORMATION IN ANY OTHER WAY DUE TO THE AGREEMENTS between GATEWEAR and the CLIENTS.
OSKAR JOHANSSON ARE NOW FACING CHARGES from the PROSECUTORS OFFICE and LITIGATION from 100+ CUSTOMERS.
OSKAR JOHANSSON quote:
"No, the ownership of the source code was never settled in court, the court only ruled that I didn't have to give the source code to you. In a later court case, I did try to get money from the bankrupt company, but the court ruled that I wasn't entitled to the money because of the 3 month you mentioned. They never ruled on whether I was an employee or a contractor, instead they said that since more than 3 month had past between the work I did and the bankruptcy, either way I wasn't entitled to any money.
I wasn't forced to deliver the source code, I was asked to do so. Since the source code was worth nothing to me (I figured you would never pay me), and I was fed up with the whole affair, I decided to be nice and just give the source code to the bankrupt company (knowing that you would at least have to pay to get it)."
KEY QUESTION to OSKAR JOHANSSON:
IF OSKAR JOHANSSON THOUGHT HE WAS ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION,
THEN WHY DIDN'T HE JUST CLAIM IT TO THE AUTHORITIES and FORCE the COMPANY INTO BANKRUPCY WITHIN THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK?
TRUTH:
OSKAR JOHANSSON WERE WELL AWARE THAT HE WAS WRONG, which the e-mail correspondence and further documentation CONFIRM.
THE OFFICIAL DOCUMENTATION from the bailiffs office (KRONOFOGDEN) and the lawyer that handled the bankrupcy of the company CLEARLY REVEAL THAT
OSKAR JOHANSSON and
NIKLAS RAMBERG WEREN'T EMPLOYEES
and IT ALSO STATE THAT THE SOURCE CODE BELONGED to GATEWEAR!
WHICH IS WHY the lawyer "OUTSMARTED" the THIEF OSKAR JOHANSSON and
LURED HIM TO HAND OVER the SOURCE CODE instead of having to go through the even longer legal process.
OSKAR JOHANSSON WANT YOU TO BELIEVE THAT HE HELD ONTO the SOURCE CODE for 3 YEARS and ALL of a sudden just gave it up.
THE COMMUNICATION with OSKAR JOHANSSON EXPOSE THAT HE REFUSED to
ACCEPT ASSISTANCE and CONTROL of his PERFORMANCE and
REFUSED to DOCUMENT HIS WORK which is STANDARD PRAXIS in SOFTWARE DEVELOPMWENT and THEREBY GATEWEAR DIDN'T KNOW WHAT THEY WOULD RECEIVE?!
THE OFFICAL COMMUNICATION with the lawer ALSO REVEAL that the SOFTWARE RIGHT DID NOT BELONG to GATEWEAR GROUP AB, but ANOTHER GATEWEAR company and the ORIGINAL RIGHTS belonged to the DIRECTOR UNTIL HIS SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS and OBLIGATIONS to FINANCIAL PARTNERS were SETTLED by GATEWEAR,
WHICH OSKAR JOHANSSON and ALL OTHER PARTNERS of GATEWEAR WERE WELL AWARE of due to the AGREEMENT between GATEWEAR and the DIRECTOR.
ALL ACTIONS FROM KEN GRUBB, ATAKAN FAMILY and the TURKISH AUTHORITIES are AIMED AT STOPPING the INNOCENT CHILDS HUMAN RIGHTS and USE THE CHILD TO EXTORT THE DIRECTOR and HIDE THE WHOLE TRUTH.
ATAKAN family are now HIDING an INNOCENT CHILD in their attempts to HIDE the SCAM and CRIMINAL ACTIVITY and EXTORT the DIRECTOR!
ONCE AGAIN the LINK that REVEAL how ATAKAN family use an INNOCENT CHILD to HIDE the SCAM.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1#!/home.php?sk=group_191175350912720&ap=1
TO BE CONTINUED... |
|
|
|
oskar
Sweden
17 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 15:55:16
|
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
TRUTH:
The charges were ONLY dropped DUE TO FACT that the DIRECTOR was ILLEGALLY DENIED to LEAVE TURKEY and COULDN'T VISIT the POLICE in SWEDEN.
OSKAR JOHANSSON ADMIT THAT HE SOLD A KEYBOARD THAT DIDN'T BELONG TO HIM and NOW CLAIM IT WAS "GIVEN" TO HIM.
WELL THE POLICE and COURT WILL DEAL WITH IT,
based on the EVIDENCE AVAILABLE THAT CONFIRM OSKAR JOHANSSONS EMBEZZLEMENT.
The police and prosecutor has already dealt with this, 6 years ago.
The evidence that you refer to, either does not exist, or is not evidence of any embezzlement. If they did exist, why didn't you present them to the police and prosecutor 6 years ago?
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
quote:Originally posted by legalstories
YOU WILL BE PRESENTED with a DOCUMENT from a meeting with the PARTNERS
(especially OSKAR JOHANSSON) were OSKAR JOHANSSON GUARANTEE TIME of DELIVERY and MORE.
Are you talking about one of the documents that was presented in the court case, where the court ruled in my favor (not having to give you the source code)?
YOU WILL BE PRESENTED WITH A DOCUMENT from a MEETING with ALL PARTNERS and KEY PEOPLE of GATEWEAR, where OSKAR JOHANSSON GUARANTEED TIME of DELIVERY AGAIN AFTER HIS MASSIVE DELAYS, BUT ONCE AGAIN TURNED OUT OT BE LIES.
If it is the document I think it is, I have it right here in front of me, and it is ridiculous. The document have already been presented to the swedish court, and they didn't find it very interesting.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT OSKAR JOHANSSON INDICATE THAT HE WOULD ACCESS CUSTOMER INFORMATION and CONTACT DATA from the SYSTEM WHICH HE HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT TO, and USE IT TO CONTACT GATEWEAR CLIENTS and DEFAME the COMPANY and DIRECTOR.
OSKAR JOHANSSON WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO RETRIEVE the CUSTOMER INFORMATION IN ANY OTHER WAY DUE TO THE AGREEMENTS between GATEWEAR and the CLIENTS.
OSKAR JOHANSSON ARE NOW FACING CHARGES from the PROSECUTORS OFFICE and LITIGATION from 100+ CUSTOMERS.
No, I indicated that it would be possible for me to access the data, not that I would do it.
After all I know that it is illegal to do so, and do you really think that I would first tell you I could access the data illegally, and then really do it?
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
OSKAR JOHANSSON quote:
"No, the ownership of the source code was never settled in court, the court only ruled that I didn't have to give the source code to you. In a later court case, I did try to get money from the bankrupt company, but the court ruled that I wasn't entitled to the money because of the 3 month you mentioned. They never ruled on whether I was an employee or a contractor, instead they said that since more than 3 month had past between the work I did and the bankruptcy, either way I wasn't entitled to any money.
I wasn't forced to deliver the source code, I was asked to do so. Since the source code was worth nothing to me (I figured you would never pay me), and I was fed up with the whole affair, I decided to be nice and just give the source code to the bankrupt company (knowing that you would at least have to pay to get it)."
KEY QUESTION to OSKAR JOHANSSON:
IF OSKAR JOHANSSON THOUGHT HE WAS ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION,
THEN WHY DIDN'T HE JUST CLAIM IT TO THE AUTHORITIES and FORCE the COMPANY INTO BANKRUPCY WITHIN THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK?
KEY ANSWER to Björn:
I wasn't sure, because the contract was vey vague. Actually I'm still not sure if I was entitled to compensation if I had forced the company into bankruptcy, but I'm sure that it is now too late to try it, so I'll never know.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
TRUTH:
OSKAR JOHANSSON WERE WELL AWARE THAT HE WAS WRONG, which the e-mail correspondence and further documentation CONFIRM.
First of all, you cannot know what I thought, and the e-mail correspondance does not confirm what you claim.
It is clear from the court cases that in most cases I wasn't wrong.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
THE OFFICIAL DOCUMENTATION from the bailiffs office (KRONOFOGDEN) and the lawyer that handled the bankrupcy of the company CLEARLY REVEAL THAT
OSKAR JOHANSSON and
------- WEREN'T EMPLOYEES
Stop naming innocent people who doesn't participate in this discussion.
I have two different letters from GGAB:s attorney, one sent to the bailiffs office in Malmö, and one to the court in Malmö.
The document sent to the bailiffs office, in july 2005, clearly states that Gatewear Group AB considered me as a contractor.
The document sent to the court, in november 2005, clearly states that Gatewear Group AB considered me as an employee.
I don't think it is that hard to understand why I say that I still don't know if I was a contractor or an employee, since GGAB claims I was both.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
and IT ALSO STATE THAT THE SOURCE CODE BELONGED to GATEWEAR!
WHICH IS WHY the lawyer "OUTSMARTED" the THIEF OSKAR JOHANSSON and
LURED HIM TO HAND OVER the SOURCE CODE instead of having to go through the even longer legal process.
OSKAR JOHANSSON WANT YOU TO BELIEVE THAT HE HELD ONTO the SOURCE CODE for 3 YEARS and ALL of a sudden just gave it up.
I wasn't outsmarted, I thought it was better for me to leave the whole mess behind me, since I figured that I would never get paid anyway.
And I made sure you didn't "steal" the source code by transferring it from GGAB to your Turkish company without paying at least some money, that in the end found it's way to those that GGAB owed money.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
THE COMMUNICATION with OSKAR JOHANSSON EXPOSE THAT HE REFUSED to
ACCEPT ASSISTANCE and CONTROL of his PERFORMANCE and
REFUSED to DOCUMENT HIS WORK which is STANDARD PRAXIS in SOFTWARE DEVELOPMWENT and THEREBY GATEWEAR DIDN'T KNOW WHAT THEY WOULD RECEIVE?!
That's just a complete lie. I refused to work under inhumane conditions.
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
THE OFFICAL COMMUNICATION with the lawer ALSO REVEAL that the SOFTWARE RIGHT DID NOT BELONG to GATEWEAR GROUP AB, but ANOTHER GATEWEAR company and the ORIGINAL RIGHTS belonged to the DIRECTOR UNTIL HIS SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS and OBLIGATIONS to FINANCIAL PARTNERS were SETTLED by GATEWEAR,
WHICH OSKAR JOHANSSON and ALL OTHER PARTNERS of GATEWEAR WERE WELL AWARE of due to the AGREEMENT between GATEWEAR and the DIRECTOR.
Well, I wasn't aware of that. You could have provided this documentation to the bailiffs office when you tried to force me to give you the source code, but you didn't do that, I wonder why?
I find it strange that the software right would belong to another company, since you paid the lawyer that handled the bankruptcy of Gatewear Group AB for the source code. What "original rights" do you think belong to you?
Drop it, this was settled in court 5-6 years ago. If I did anything wrong, it was to trust you in the first place.
BTW, I'm not part of any "CRIMINAL NETWORK". |
|
|
|
oskar
Sweden
17 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 16:01:26
|
quote:
Originally posted by legalstories
- STEAL the SOFTWARE RIGHTS and BUSINESS
- HIDE THAT THEY TRIED TO "BUY" THE SOFTWARE with a EURO 10.000.000
STOLEN CHEQUE from BBL BANK
- HIDE THAT THEY OPENDED a FAKE EURO 2.000.000 L/C from AZALBANK to
SWEDBANK to "BUY" the SOFTWARE RIGHTS in a COUNTRY
When did this occur? I'm not exactly sure when you bought the software, but I think it was during 2009 or maybe even 2010.
Did you try to sell it before you bought it, and if so were the buyer aware of this? or did this happen after you bought the software? |
|
|
|
Ken
USA
496 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 16:14:12
|
About all you can do is use semantics to try to portray me as a liar.
I loaned you the money first. That was January 2007. After that I put in work and time to help you restart your business. That is what I was referring to regarding helping you restart your business.
During the year after I loaned you the large sum of money I ran around trying to help you with finding an office, and ship samples (which involved loaning you even more money on multiple occasions in the hopes you would some day pay me everything back).
And it was during the following year that you told me your bank account had been blocked. You did not tell me this before I loaned you the money.
It doesn't make sense that you would have told me that you had a bank transfer in progress which would be in your account the following week, and then also tell me that your bank account was blocked.
When you finally told me your bank account was blocked, I thought it was a recent event. I only learned that your bank account had been blocked for a long time -- before I loaned you the money -- in this very topic. So what your saying is that you withheld information which would have caused me to question your promise to pay me back the following week.
And you never did pay me back. All I got was excuses regarding why you couldn't pay me back and why it was somebody else's fault.
Once you even said you were going to pay me back but didn't know which currency I wanted to be paid in, and you couldn't contact me. Of course I sad "ANY CURRENCY!" But by that time I had missed some magical window of opportunity to recoup my losses, and again, not being paid back was my fault for not having my mobile phone on during this magical moment.
Sound familiar, Oskar? |
|
|
|
oskar
Sweden
17 Posts |
Posted - Jan 06 2012 : 16:34:19
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ken
Sound familiar, Oskar?
The part were nothing is Björn's fault sounds extremely familiar, and also the part where he's soon going to get the money that is needed, but of course that never happens.
I bet that at least sometime it was my fault that you didn't get any money. I remember something about a court case as a reason (In your original post on this forum, or was that someone else?).
The fastest, and probably cheapest way that Björn could have handled the whole mess would have been to pay me for my work. That would have resulted in, he getting the software, I would have been available to improve the software and Gatewear could have done real business instead of hiring lawyers and Björn wouldn't have to be busy writing emails to his lawyers, and he wouldn't have had to loan money from you in the first place. Instead he sued me and I got pissed off. Well what can you say? |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
Izmir, Turkey - The Inside Story
