All Forums  Businesses From Hell  Scam and Con Artists  Izmir, Turkey - The Inside Story

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize: 640 x 480 800 x 600 1024 x 768 1280 x 1024 UserName: Password: Format Mode: Basic  Help  Prompt  Format: Font Andale Mono Arial Arial Black Book Antiqua Century Gothic Comic Sans MS Courier New Georgia Impact Lucida Console Script MT Bold Stencil Tahoma Times New Roman Trebuchet MS Verdana   Size 1 2 3 4 5 6   Color Black Red Yellow Pink Green Orange Purple Blue Beige Brown Teal Navy Maroon LimeGreen Message: * HTML is OFF * Forum Code is ON Smilies [quote][i]Originally posted by oskar[/i] [br][quote][i]Originally posted by legalstories[/i] TRUTH: GATEWEAR HAS BEEN VERY PATIENT and WAITED for OSKAR JOHANSSONS TESTIMONY BEFORE THEY WOULD PRESENT the EVIDENCE and EXPOSE HIS LIES. [/quote] Here's some free advice: Present any evidence BEFORE the prosecutor drops the charges. Actually there cannot be any evidence, since a crime was not committed. The prosecutor realized that and did the only right thing in situation like that. The rest of your rant is regarding a completely different event, in which I had no part, so I will not comment on that. [quote][i]Originally posted by legalstories[/i] The DIRECTOR and ALL OTHER INVOLVED PARTIES WERE WELL AWARE that OSKAR JOHANSSON WERE NOT EMPLOYED, and THE PEOPLE WHO WERE EMPLOYED HAD PROPER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS. OSKAR JOHANSSON ADMIT THAT HE CONSIDER HIMSELF AS AN EMPLOYEE, and THEREBY CONFIRM THAT HE HAD NO LEGAL RIGHT TO REFUSE TO HAND OVER the SOURCE CODE to the COMPANY according to the LAW. [/quote] I actually wanted the court to decide if or if not I was employed, but they never did. [quote][i]Originally posted by legalstories[/i] GATEWEAR ACTED TO GET THE SOURCE CODE by the LEGAL RIGHTS of EMPLOYMENT LAW AFTER OSKAR JOHANSSON and ------ HAD WRONGLY CLAIMED they were EMPLOYED, which e-mail communication and OFFICIAL RECORDS CONFIRM. OSKAR JOHANSSON IS ONCE AGAIN LYING! [/quote] What am I lying about? [quote][i]Originally posted by legalstories[/i] VERY IMPORTANT FACTS TO CONSIDER: DOES ANYBODY BELIEVE that OSKAR JOHANSSON whos mother ------ was a CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANT at the WORLDWIDE ACCOUNTING FIRM ------ WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND and ASK for A PROPER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT IF HE CONSIDERED HIMSELF AS AN EMPLOYEE, when HE WAS WELL AWARE of THE SALES PEOPLES PROPER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS? [/quote] Once again, don't mention innocent persons by name, it's very rude and you're just making yourself look bad. I have asked the administrator to remove names in your posts, so I hope he/she will do it soon. Since I never consulted with my mother before signing the contract, my mistake (in signing a lousy contract) is all mine. I wasn't well aware of your contract at that time. I was a partner in the company, and it never occurred to me that you were trying to set me up. [quote][i]Originally posted by legalstories[/i] OSKAR JOHANSSON were CONFRONTED by the SALES PEOPLE PRIOR to their employment with the QUESTION: CAN YOU GUARANTEE DELIVER IN TIME as STATED in YOUR CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, SINCE WE CAN'T RISK OUR FAMILIES LIVES IF YOU CAN'T GUARANTEE DELIVER ON TIME! THE SALES PEOPLE WERE ALSO UNABLE TO SELL ANYTHING, DUE TO OSKAR JOHANSSONS DELAYS and UNWILLINGNESS to COOPERATE be under SUPERVISION in SWEDEN. [/quote] "The sales people", is that you? Never mind, your just ranting again. [quote][i]Originally posted by legalstories[/i] OSKAR JOHANSSON DOESN'T NEED TO WORRY ABOUT THE PRESENT and FUTURE STATUS of the SOFTWARE, since THE BRAIN (ARCHITECT) BEHIND THE SOFTWARE was the DIRECTOR and BETTER PROGRAMMERS (CONTRACTORS) are AVAILABLE that DO UNDERSTAND WHO IS IN CHARGE and WHAT THE LAW SAYS of COPYRIGHTS, EMPLOYMENT and CONTRACTUAL/CORPORATE LAW. [/quote] I don't worry about it, I don't even care. Although I feel empathy for all those "better programmers" if they have to work with you in charge. The basic idea for the software was yours, but to call yourself the architect is just wrong. [quote][i]Originally posted by legalstories[/i] The software wasn't OSKAR JOHANSSONS. HE WAS RE-DEVELOPING the software based on the - FUNCTIONAL DOCUMENTATION - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION - GUIDANCE by the director and other partners and ESPECIALLY on the first version partially developed by another CRIMINAL COMPANY who ALSO TRIED to STEAL the SOFTWARE in cooperation with GATEWEAR. [/quote] I've never said anything else. The "first version" was a completely different source code that the external developing company never released. So, I wrote the software from scratch, based on the specifications that already existed. [quote][i]Originally posted by legalstories[/i] PRIOR to OSKAR JOHANSSON working on a new version of the software, a team of 12 people from another company had developed and solved the CRITICAL POINTS, and in addition 7 PEOPLE worked in GATEWEARS swedish development office. The 3D models were partially made by ------ The GUI was partially made by ------ The system overview and admnistration were performed by Jonas The OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE was made by the director and the COMPANY DOCUMENTAION REVEAL that they RECEIVED their COMPANY SHARES for this job. BEFORE ALL DEVELOPMENT STARTED the director haad spent LARGE AMOUNTS and TIME of his employees as well as paying marketing survey companies and consultants to retrieve the information required for the development and market entry. The amount was in MILLIONS, as the BOOK KEEPING in the companies and PRIVATE ACCOUNTS CONFIRM. [/quote] The first version was developed by an external company, but nothing of their code base was available when I started working on the software. The 3D models were great, and without them the product wouldn't have been useful. But still, is the 3D models part of the software or are they resources used by the software? And also, I did some modeling too. The user interface was designed prior to when I started coding, but it had to be implemented, and I did have a lot to do with designing the interface together with the person you named. So Jonas was using the software I created, what's your point? Yes, you had the initial idea, and you probably did some research before this, but I've never said that you didn't. You spent millions on a lot of crap, I wanted 10.000 euros for my work, as stated in the lousy contract. [quote][i]Originally posted by legalstories[/i] WELL, since all other involved parties delivered their work to be implemented by OSKAR JOHANSSON it is EVIDENT that OSKAR JOHANSSON ALONE DID STOP GATEWEAR (not the director) from retrieving the source code. ALL IS WELL DOCUMENTED and EXPOSE OSKAR JOHANSSON LIES! EVEN the 3D MODELER e-mailed OSKAR JOHANSSON and TOLD HIM to DELIVER, and HE ALSO TOLD HIM FACE TO FACE when OSKAR JOHANSSON came down to TURKEY with JONAS to PREPARE for their MOVE to TURKEY AFTER OSKAR JOHANSSONS DELIVERY which HE LIED ABOUT. The TICKETS, e-mail correspondence and RECORDINGS from the visit speak for themselves. IN ADDITION the DOCUMENT from the meeting with ALL PARTNERS and KEY PEOPLE of GATEWEAR EXPOSE OSKAR JOHANSSONS LIES [/quote] Since you had all the other pieces, couldn't you have found someone else to implement the software if my part of the work was so insignificant? You could have paid the amount stated in the contract, and I would have delivered the code. [/quote]